Regal, Minnesota | |
---|---|
— City — | |
Location of Regal, Minnesota | |
Coordinates: | |
Country | United States |
State | Minnesota |
County | Kandiyohi |
Area | |
• Total | 0.5 sq mi (1.3 km2) |
• Land | 0.5 sq mi (1.3 km2) |
• Water | 0.0 sq mi (0.0 km2) |
Elevation | 1,220 ft (372 m) |
Population (2010)[1] | |
• Total | 34 |
• Density | 79.4/sq mi (30.7/km2) |
Time zone | Central (CST) (UTC-6) |
• Summer (DST) | CDT (UTC-5) |
Area code(s) | 320 |
FIPS code | 27-53710[2] |
GNIS feature ID | 0649916[3] |
Regal is a city in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota, United States, along the North Fork of the Crow River. The population was 34 at the 2010 census.[1]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total land area of 0.5 square miles (1.3 km2).
Minnesota State Highway 55 serves as a main route in the community.
As of the census[2] of 2000, there were 40 people, 19 households, and 11 families residing in the city. The population density was 79.4 people per square mile (30.9/km²). There were 20 housing units at an average density of 39.7 per square mile (15.4/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 97.50% White and 2.50% Asian.
There were 19 households out of which 15.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 47.4% were married couples living together, and 42.1% were non-families. 26.3% of all households were made up of individuals and 26.3% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.11 and the average family size was 2.64.
In the city the population was spread out with 10.0% under the age of 18, 15.0% from 18 to 24, 25.0% from 25 to 44, 27.5% from 45 to 64, and 22.5% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 44 years. For every 100 females there were 100.0 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 125.0 males.
The median income for a household in the city was $39,167, and the median income for a family was $60,417. Males had a median income of $50,417 versus $27,500 for females. The per capita income for the city was $26,710. None of the population and none of the families were below the poverty line.
|